Despite this mention, Rune’s inclusion in the document has sparked debate. As a former world No. 4 with over £9 million in career earnings, Rune may not fit the profile of a player who would significantly benefit from relaxed exhibition rules. Given his frequent deep runs in tournaments, he is more likely to focus on competing in the latter stages of Slams rather than seeking alternative events.
This legal battle is part of the PTPA’s broader criticism of tennis’ governing bodies, challenging the sport’s scheduling, ranking system, and restrictions on player image rights. The case underscores ongoing tensions between the PTPA and traditional tennis authorities as players push for greater autonomy and financial opportunities.
