Alex de Minaur confirms top players in discussions with Grand Slams in attempt to force change in tennis

Alex de Minaur Reveals Top Players in Talks With Grand Slams to Push for Major Change in Tennis

Alex de Minaur has confirmed that elite players on the ATP and WTA tours are holding active discussions with the four Grand Slam tournaments in an effort to drive meaningful change in professional tennis.

The world No. 8 revealed that conversations are already underway between leading players and tournament organisers, signalling a rare moment of unity among the sport’s biggest stars as they attempt to influence the direction of the game.

What are players pushing for?

While de Minaur stopped short of naming every athlete involved, he acknowledged that a coalition of top-ranked players are pushing for key reforms, including:

• Fairer revenue distribution and prize-money structure
• A stronger player voice in governance and major decisions
• Improved consultation on scheduling and calendar changes
• Better long-term planning around workload and player welfare

The core of the movement is simple: players feel they deserve a larger say in how the sport’s biggest events — and biggest revenues — are run.

The four Grand Sllam tournaments (Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, US Open) generate the largest share of tennis revenue worldwide, yet players and governing bodies have previously clashed over financial fairness and transparency.

A united front from the top

De Minaur’s comments suggest this is not an isolated frustration, but a coordinated push involving some of the sport’s most recognised names. Reports around the wider movement have pointed to players from both tours aligning on the issue, calling for stronger negotiation and long-term reform.

While the exact list of participants in the discussions remains undisclosed, other high-profile players such as Aryna Sabalenka, Iga Świątek, Jannik Sinner, Casper Ruud and Madison Keys have previously spoken publicly about the need for greater player input and fairer financial structures in tennis — hinting at a broader alliance across both the ATP and WTA.

Why this matters

For decades, tennis has operated with a fragmented power structure — players, tours, and Grand Slams often working in parallel rather than in partnership. But in an era where athletes in other sports have successfully pushed for greater revenue share and governance influence, tennis players are now aiming to do the same.

If the sport’s biggest stars mobilise collectively, they hold enormous leverage. The Grand Slams rely heavily on the participation and promotion of top-ranked talent — without them, the product loses its core value.

That dynamic means organisers may be more open to negotiation than ever before.

What happens next?

The talks are still in early stages, but several scenarios could emerge if momentum continues:

✅ Revised prize-money distribution models
✅ A formalised player role in major decision-making bodies
✅ Changes to season structure and scheduling
✅ More transparency around tournament revenue and investments

However, if discussions stall, tennis could see increased public pressure — or even boycott threats — from leading players, a scenario the sport has historically tried to avoid.

A turning point for tennis?

De Minaur’s comments mark one of the clearest indications yet that players are no longer willing to remain on the sidelines when it comes to shaping their sport.

With both tours and Grand Slam organisers now under pressure to negotiate, this moment could represent a shift toward a more unified, player-driven future in tennis.

As momentum grows, one thing is clear: the conversation has begun — and the world’s best players are determined to be heard.